Author: ArabianRecords.org

The new lord mayor was born in Mogadishu and came to Bristol over two decades ago.

A former refugee who fled war in Somalia has become the lord mayor of Bristol and will represent Bristol City Council for the next year. The lord mayor is largely a ceremonial role and acts as a figurehead for the city council as well as playing a key part in citizenship ceremonies.

Green Councillor Yassin Mohamud was sworn in as lord mayor for the new civic year during a full council meeting on Tuesday, May 12. The “first citizen” of Bristol stays in post for a year, and is chosen by other councillors. They chair full council meetings and attend a range of events.

Speaking during the meeting, he said he wanted to use the platform to celebrate Bristol’s diversity and celebrate the different cultures and faiths in the city. He added that serving as lord mayor was the “greatest privilege of my life”.

Cllr Mohamud said: “It’s a deep honour to stand before you today as the first lord mayor of Somali origin in Bristol. I look forward to serving all of Bristol over the next year.”

The lord mayor was born in Mogadishu, the capital of Somalia, and grew up in the south of the country. He later worked in the government’s plant protection department, before fleeing the war there and coming to Bristol with his family. They now live in St Jude’s. He was first elected as a councillor in 2021, representing the ward of Lawrence Hill, and was then re-elected in 2024.

He added: “Like so many people who arrive in a new country, the transition was not easy. But luckily for me, the city I arrived in was Bristol. Moving to a country is a great challenge: you must learn a new language and new customs, and work out unfamiliar systems. You must find schools for your children, a job, and most importantly, find community.

“Like many people in our city, my understanding of politics did not begin in a formal setting. It came from my lived experience of moving to Bristol. It came from seeing how decisions affect everyday life, the quality of housing, the safety of streets, the opportunities available to young people, and whether communities feel seen and heard.”

Following the Barton House evacuation in 2023, he worked with colleagues to push for changes that better support residents affected by unsafe housing conditions, and has supported efforts to reopen and protect community spaces in tower blocks.

The outgoing lord mayor was Conservative Cllr Henry Michallat, who will become the deputy lord mayor for this year. Colleagues praised his “wisdom above his years”, while he said he had attended more than 420 events over the course of last year, and oversaw more than 1,200 people becoming British citizens.

Cllr Michallat said: “One of my highlights was championing my theme as lord mayor: supporting the arts, culture and history of the city. It was great to go to so many historic institutions across our city, as well as lots of music venues. I particularly enjoyed sitting through the amateur dramatics performance of Les Mis in my chain, that was very good.

“It was also an honour to represent Bristol on the world stage. In March I went to Guangzhou in China and met the mayor and various politicians and people within the local community, as we approach our 25th anniversary of our twinning relationship. In April I went to Bordeaux in France and met the deputy mayor at their City Hall, ahead of our 80th anniversary of our twinning.”

source/content: bristolpost.co.uk (headline edited)

_____________

Cllr Yassin Mohamud outside of Bristol City Hall (Image: Bristol Green Party)

______________________

BRITISH / SOMALIAN

Algerian athlete Yasser Triki recorded the world’s best triple jump result this season on Thursday evening, achieving a leap of 17.35 meters during the events of the Liévin International Meeting in France, part of the World Athletics Indoor Tour Gold.

Yasser Triki succeeded in taking first place deservedly, recording a jump of 17.35 meters, which is the best globally so far in 2026, and the third-best mark in Triki’s sporting career.

The victory of the Algerian champion came in a strong competition that saw the participation of an elite group of the most prominent specialists in this sport, led by Jamaican Jordan Scott and Cuban Lázaro Martínez, the bronze medalist at the 2025 World Championships.

Following the end of the competition, Triki expressed his happiness with this achievement, saying: “I am very happy to be here in Liévin once again, and I hope to participate in this meeting until the end of my career.” He added, “My coach and I expected to achieve (a jump) between 17.30 and 17.40 meters after reaching the final stages of preparation for the World Championships. The main goal for me is the World Championships a month from now (…) The best performance, you haven’t seen it yet.”

With this new achievement, Triki continues to honor Algerian athletics on the international stage, enhancing his chances of achieving positive results during the upcoming international events.

source/content: news.radioalgerie.dz/en (headline edited)

_____________

______________

ALGERIA

Arab parliament speakers to meet online June 10-11

AIPU gathering to focus on coordination, stability and Arab solidarity

Saudi Arabia will host the 39th Conference of the Arab Inter-Parliamentary Union by videoconference on June 10-11 under the patronage of King Salman.

The meeting, organized by the Saudi Shoura Council and the AIPU, will bring together speakers of Arab parliaments and legislative councils along with delegates from several regional organizations.

Shoura Council Speaker Sheikh Abdullah bin Mohammed Al Al-Sheikh said the royal patronage reflected Saudi Arabia’s support for joint Arab cooperation and efforts to reinforce regional security and stability.

He said Arab parliamentary coordination was essential to confront shared challenges, unify positions and promote development and integration in the Arab world.

Al Al-Sheikh added that the conference was expected to strengthen parliamentary diplomacy and support coordination on Arab issues at regional and international levels.

Founded in Damascus in 1974 after the October War, the AIPU is a regional body that seeks to deepen cooperation among Arab parliaments, coordinate positions on regional and international issues, support Arab solidarity and national security, and promote dialogue, representative democracy and human rights.

The 38th Conference of the AIPU was hosted by Algeria on May 3, 2025.

source/content: arabnews.com (headlines edited)

_______________

This photo taken on May 3, 2025, shows Sheikh Abdullah bin Mohammed Al Al-Sheikh, speaker of Saudi Arabia’s Shoura Council, attending the 38th AIPU Conference in Algiers. (SPA)

__________________________________________________________

SAUDI ARABIA / ARAB INTER-PARLIAMENTARY UNION

Anthropologist Abdelmajid Hannoum has just published a fascinating historical enquiry into the origin of the term Maghreb, invented to a large extent by the theoreticians of French colonialism. That word, which he has studied in various archives, especially those of the Bureaux Arabes, did much to cut the region off from the rest of the African continent and the Middle East.

Abdelmajid Hannoum is an anthropologist who teaches at Kansas University and is the author of a scholarly tome on the history of North African mythologies. Based on Arab sources and colonial archives, his work has led him to analyse with remarkable precision the figure of the Berber queen Kahina or the relationship between colonialism, violence and modernity. Cambridge University Press has published this year his latest book: The Invention of the Maghreb. Between Africa and the Middle East, a work which raises a major question: is the Maghreb a colonial invention?

Hannoum exposes the consequences which the colonial narrative had—and continues to have—on the genesis of North-African regional groupings since, in his view, colonial rhetoric was not content to wreak havoc among existing identities and traditions but created others out of whole cloth. These seem authentically local but have never been any such thing. The term Maghreb, he claims, is not the least of these inventions.

Consider the name Maghreb; it is almost unchallenged. It appears Arab, even local, from the heart of the local tradition, yet it is a francophone name as well, invented from a translated Arabic tradition, its ’foreign’ resonance hiding its colonial invention. (p. 232)

Nation-building narratives

As a geographical, historical, and anthropological construction, the Maghreb was isolated by the theoreticians of French colonialism in Africa as well as the Middle East. Of course, as Hannoum reminds us, the notion that Egypt and the Maghreb constitute two separate zones is not only a colonial idea. Both Romans and Arabs distinguished Egypt from Africa/Ifriqia. However, nowhere do they mention the idea of a “white” Africa as opposed to a “black” Africa, notion developed much later by geographer Emile-Félix Gautier and taken up by historian Charles-André Julien.

Hannoum’s book inaugurates a reflection on the function of history and its relation to the structures of power. He points out that contrary to the colonising nations, the Ottomans made few efforts to develop methods of power based on historical narratives intended for societies under the sway of the Sublime Porte. Their writings describing the past took the form of chronicles or annals but were not meant to be nation-building instruments. The idea was to confer legitimacy on the Sultan’s power, not to grant any to his subjects by way of an historical narrative:

The conception of history (of which archaeology is a part) as a” science” of the past, one that is politically useful, and even vital since it provides the substance of the nation and the validation of the state, is part of modernity (p. 19)

Hannoum shows that Western modernity is characterised not so much by the elevation of history to the rank of sconce as by its accession to the rank of discipline capable of legitimising the construction of a nation and the validation of the State. In the Ottoman provinces, on the other hand, “Even in the work of Ibn Abi Diyâf ¹, history remains an auxiliary of religion, not a major tool for building nationhood” (p. 19). Nationhood is achieved without any separation from the centrality of Islam.

As early as the 17^th C., he reminds us, the ruling regimes present in Tunisia and Algeria were perceived as autonomous and negotiated as such with the European powers. The efforts made later to conceptualise and describe the geography and boundaries of the Maghreb were accomplished by French officers, scientists and colonial officials. Even after independence, a good many local and national historians continued to use models inspired by the colonial narrative and to write them down in French:

Hence, the sad observation that French—not Arabic—remains the language of the study of the area, its history, its culture, its population, even its intimate sexuality. (p. 23)

A cartographic invention

Several sections lend credence to the idea that the Maghreb is a French invention. The first associates geography and cartography. Maps are cultural artefacts produced by the power structure and State institutions. “For even as states have the monopoly over historical production, so do they over cartographic production” (p. 31). Thus, the map of the Maghreb is a graphic representation produced by the colonial power structure: “(…) the Maghreb itself is not only a French colonial creation but also the product of and the field of colonial power”.

18^th C. cartographers depicted a region called Barbary, sometimes split up in different units (Kingdoms of Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia and Tripoli) from which Egypt was excluded as was “Black Africa” (called “Nigrita”). While the region did not wait until the 1830s to be mapped, the occupation of Algeria and its annexation by France constituted a decisive break with the old maps. As the conquest of the country proceeded, the French presence in Algeria served as an argument to justify its occupation of Tunisia to the detriment of Italy, and Morocco, to the detriment of Spain.

Maps were soon showing a North Africa devoid of Libya—under Italian influence—and of Egypt under the sway of Britain, —in other words an Africa identified with French possessions. In Hannoum’s view, “Atlases are not just maps whose signs are to be read and deciphered” (p. 65). They express power relationships and the cartographic division between North Africa, West Africa and East Africa was based not so much on anthropological realities as on the rivalries between colonial powers.

A partial vision of archaeology

The author’s second approach is through archaeology, which he designates as one of the most important disciplines involved in the creation of modern identities.

Dealing with the importance attached to the ancient ruins unearthed in Algeria and the Maghreb, Hannoum points out that the French colonial imaginary encompassed Islamic as well as Roman history, the former being envisaged as “other” while the latter was “ours”. The presence of Roman ruins in Algeria and the interest they aroused contributed to the construction of a narrative which made Algeria an extension of Rome and, by identification, a part of France. Prioritising Roman archaeology, colonial research made short shrift of other narratives: Punic, Arab, Islamic or Berber. Thus, the Arabs were regarded as an illegitimate population since they came from the East to a region which was “historically” Western.

Hannoum develops the concept of historiographic state. After 1870 a colonial state asserted itself in Algeria. Not content to produce the tools for knowing and governing the colony, it also transformed the colony thanks to that very knowledge. From then on, history became the key discipline, serving to legitimise colonial sovereignty. This later became more sophisticated with the creation of such institutions as the University of Algiers, where the faculty included such important figures as Stéphane Gsell and Fernand Braudel.

The historiographic state made Algeria a French territory and created the semantic foundations for a region called the Maghreb. In this sense it was different from the ethnographic state, the form taken by the power in the early days of armed conquest. It was in 1870 that the civil authorities took over from the military and the historiographic state replaced the ethnographic state. Historians took over from the officers with ethnographic training who had manned the Bureaux Arabes and assumed the task of validating colonisation through the traces of the past. In other words, history—as is so often the case—placed itself at the service of present-day needs.

Hannoum also shows how that conception was popularised by way of tourist guides:

Tourist guides of the Maghreb reinforce the idea that the region is a single unit and yet, despite distance and geographical interruption between it and France, it constitutes a continuous part of the metropole, linked to it by historical connections (p. 113).

The ruins of Volubilis, that “Moroccan Pompei”, served to bind Morocco to a Latinity of which France claimed to be the heir. This picture postcard Maghreb, made up of shots of archaeological diggings was also illustrated by French novelists, from Flaubert to Camus.

Language, race, and territory

The author’s third approach is threefold, associating language, race, and territory. Descriptions of the Maghreb have, to this very day, ascribed a key importance to the distinction between Arabs and Berbers. That dichotomy was built on a racialist basis drawn from Arthur de Gobineau’s theory of races which held sway in Europe well beyond the 19^th C. Hannoum points out that immediately after its military conquest, the first visitors to Algeria—among them de Tocqueville and Louis-Adrien Berbrugger—did not fail to observe the diversity of the population.

While Berbrugger saw the inhabitants of Algeria as belonging exclusively to the Semitic race, he did admit that the latter was highly varied, made up of Jews, Turks, Moors, Kouloughlis, Berbers, and Arabs. On the other hand, Hannoum tells us, a decade later, i.e. after the 1850s, this description of racial diversity vanishes to be replaced by the Arabs/Berbers dichotomy. Hannoun thinks the Bureaux arabes are at the origin of that dichotomy. It was in Algeria that they first made this sharp distinction between Arabs and Berbers, and later Morocco, when the Native Affairs Service was established to replace the Bureaux Arabes.

Hannoum believes that the idea of setting up a barrier between Arabic and Berber, defining Arabic as a non-native language, differs from the Arab conception of the language, less rigid if we abide by the one established by Ibn Khaldùn. The latter distinguished between two language categories: lisân (لسان) and lughât (لغة). The lughât is the abstract language spoken and written by a generation. The lisân is an updating of the lughât, now spoken by the present generation, the everyday language of practical things, a living language that changes as it passes from one generation to the next. Ibn Khaldùn was also aware that it was likely to vary through contact with non-Arabic speakers, and his conception of the language was a dynamic one.

Hannoum goes on:

Colonial linguists constructed Berber as a single language that crosses northern Africa from central Morocco to Libya. But the various “Berber languages” are as distinct from one another as Hebrew from Arabic and as Arabic from Aramaic (p. 137).

According to him, a new generation of orientalists seem to have refined the racial concept using a linguistic argument. But in the last analysis, they hitched language to the concept of race in order to create geographical and cultural particularities equivalent to the old racial prioritisations. The colonial postulate remained that of the purity of language—be it Arabic or Berber—in line with the purity of race. In this sense, Arabic was described as a language foreign to Algeria and by extension to North Africa.

One strange fact revealed by Hannoum concerns Emile-Félix Gautier who was the chief historian of North Africa in the inter-war years and yet who spoke neither Arabic nor Berber. It was he, nonetheless, who imposed the name Maghreb for the three French colonies in Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia². He built a legitimacy inscribed in ancestral times to justify the colonial separation between French Maghreb, Italian Libya and British Levant. He cast aside Arab historiography—which he could only read in translation—on the pretext that it was unintelligible for a Western mind and undertook to reinterpret the region by emphasising the role of the Berbers and their European connections. In Gautier’s interpretation, Hannoum explains, if the Berbers, sedentary villagers, who have much in common “with us”, were incapable of forming a nation it was because they were prevented from doing so by the predations of the nomadic Arabs.

Hammoun does not confine his critical analysis to French and European authors but extends it by pointing out how modern authors in the Moslem and/or African traditions have sought to elaborate a different narrative. He concludes that whether they come from Muslim traditionalism, Arab nationalism or “négritude”, they often turn the colonial narrative upside down but without changing it in any way.

source/content: orientxxi.info / julien lacassagne (headline edited)

_____________

Map of the Maghreb (1843) by the geographer Alexandre Vuillemin, taken from his Atlas universel de géographie ancienne et moderne à l’usage des pensionnats (Universal Atlas of ancient and modern geography for the use of boarding schools)

Wikimedia Commons

_____________

MOROCCAN / FRENCH / AMERICAN

Abu Dhabi’s AD Ports Group has entered the Latin American market through the acquisition of Brazil’s Corredor Logistica e Infraestrutura, a leading independent agri-bulk port terminal operator, in a deal valued at 3.1 billion dirhams ($835 million).

The move strengthens AD Ports Group’s exposure to global agricultural supply chains through key export terminals at the ports of Santos and Itaqui. CLI operates two strategic assets under long-term concessions.

CLI Sul, located at the Port of Santos, is a major sugar export terminal and an important gateway for corn and soybean shipments. CLI Norte operates at the Port of Itaqui in Brazil’s rapidly growing “Arc of the North” logistics corridor, a major route for agricultural exports.

The acquisition reflects growing efforts by Gulf logistics and infrastructure companies to expand internationally through investments in strategic assets along global trade routes. Brazil, one of the world’s largest exporters of agricultural commodities, has attracted increasing investor interest amid rising demand for food security, supply-chain resilience and export infrastructure.

Mohamed Juma Al-Shamisi, managing director and CEO of AD Ports Group, described the acquisition as a “game changer” for the company.

“The transaction extends our group’s international reach for the first time into Latin America, and deepens our growing agrifoods activities, one of our core verticals,” he said.

AD Ports Group, which operates in more than 50 countries, said it is acquiring CLI from joint owners Macquarie Asset Management and IG4 Capital. CLI owns 100 percent of CLI Norte and an 80 percent stake in CLI Sul.

Al-Shamisi said the investment would strengthen the company’s global network while supporting trade in one of the world’s fastest-growing agricultural commodities markets.

Fernando Lohmann, head of Macquarie Asset Management in Brazil, said the country’s agricultural export sector continues to demonstrate resilience, reinforcing its role as a leading global supplier of agricultural commodities.

He added that AD Ports Group is well-positioned to support CLI’s next phase of growth.

Paulo Todescan L. Mattos, co-founder, managing partner and CEO of IG4 Capital, said the company had focused on strengthening CLI’s operations and positioning it for long-term growth since becoming a shareholder.

He said AD Ports Group brings global trade expertise, infrastructure capabilities and a long-term investment horizon that will support the business going forward.

According to the company, ports and terminals in northern Brazil recorded the country’s fastest growth in 2025, underscoring the rising importance of the Arc of the North corridor in reshaping Brazil’s logistics network.

The transaction is expected to close in the second half of 2025, subject to regulatory and antitrust approvals. CLI’s senior management team will remain in place following completion.

The acquisition expands AD Ports Group’s global footprint across maritime, logistics and trade infrastructure while establishing a presence in South America’s growing agri-bulk terminal sector.

source/content: arabnews.com (headline edited)

______________

The move strengthens AD Ports Group’s exposure to global agricultural supply chains through key export terminals at the ports of Santos and Itaqui.

_____________________

ABU DHABI, U.A.E

The Egyptian diaspora in North America represents a vast reservoir of experience, knowledge, capital, and international exposure that could contribute meaningfully to Egypt’s future development.

Across the US and Canada, Egyptian communities have built one of the quiet success stories of modern immigration. 

Over several decades, Egyptians have established themselves in medicine, engineering, academia, business, finance, technology, and the arts without drawing much attention to themselves. Their rise has been gradual, steady, and deeply rooted in education and professional discipline. Today, Egyptian names can be found in major hospitals, universities, laboratories, research centres, banks, technology firms, and private companies across North America.

What makes these communities particularly remarkable is that distance has not dissolved their relationship with Egypt. Many Egyptian families abroad remain emotionally tied to their towns and villages in Upper Egypt and the Delta or to Cairo, Alexandria, and the Canal cities. Parents still speak to their children about the streets where they grew up, the schools they attended, and the neighbourhoods they left behind decades ago. Visits to Egypt remain part of family life. Weddings, holidays, summer vacations, and religious occasions continue to draw many expatriates back home, even after years of settlement abroad.

This attachment has endured across generations. Many second- and third-generation Egyptian-Americans still grow up with a strong sense of belonging to Egypt while remaining fully integrated into American and Canadian society. Churches, mosques, family gatherings, cultural associations, and social networks have helped preserve that connection. Technology has strengthened it further. Daily communication has erased much of the distance that once separated immigrant families from their homeland.

Meanwhile, the professional profile of Egyptian communities has continued to evolve. Egyptian-origin physicians have become highly visible within American and Canadian healthcare systems, particularly in specialised medicine and surgery. Egyptian academics have risen through university systems as researchers, professors, deans, and administrators. 

Engineers and scientists have contributed to advances in medicine, software, artificial intelligence, and other cutting-edge technologies. Others have entered business, construction, pharmaceuticals, real estate, hospitality, and financial services. In many cities, Egyptians have developed reputations for educational achievement, technical competence, and strong professional ethics.

The environment in North America provided these communities with room to grow. Access to advanced universities, research institutions, healthcare systems, and open markets created opportunities that many immigrants transformed into lasting success. Egyptians have become part of the broader immigrant experience that has helped shape modern America and Canada alongside Greeks, Indians, Eastern Europeans, Turks, and many others. Yet, Egyptian communities have also often maintained exceptionally strong family structures and educational priorities, helping successive generations advance socially and professionally.

For years, Egypt tended to view expatriates primarily through the lens of remittances or sentimental attachment to the homeland. The reality today, however, is far greater. Egyptian communities abroad represent a vast reservoir of experience, knowledge, capital, and international exposure that could contribute meaningfully to Egypt’s future development.

The global economy is changing rapidly. Technology, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, medical innovation, and digital infrastructure increasingly determine the strength of nations. Many Egyptians abroad already work within these advanced sectors. Some participate in cutting-edge medical research. Others work in software engineering, AI systems, data science, pharmaceutical development, or advanced manufacturing. The expertise already exists. The challenge is how to build serious and lasting channels between these professionals and Egypt’s long-term development needs.

Healthcare offers one clear example. Egyptian doctors abroad have accumulated decades of experience in some of the world’s most advanced hospitals and medical institutions. Their knowledge could support training programmes, research partnerships, emergency medicine development, and specialised medical education within Egypt. Similar opportunities exist in higher education. Egyptian professors and academics working at leading North American universities understand how modern research institutions operate, how scientific funding is managed, and how universities integrate technology into education and innovation.

The same thing applies to technology. The gap between advanced economies and developing countries is increasingly measured by research capacity, software systems, patents, artificial intelligence, and digital infrastructure. Egyptian expatriates working in these fields could help connect Egypt to emerging technologies that will shape future industries and economies.

Investment is equally important. Many expatriates maintain a genuine interest in contributing to Egypt through investments in real estate, industry, tourism, pharmaceuticals, and technology ventures. Emotional attachment alone, however, cannot sustain long-term investment. Investors seek stability, transparency, efficient administration, and predictable regulations. Expatriates who have spent decades working within advanced economic systems naturally expect professional standards and clear procedures when dealing with institutions in their country of origin.

The younger Egyptian-American generation may ultimately become the most important bridge between Egypt and North America. Young professionals growing up in the US and Canada move comfortably between cultures, technologies, and international business environments. Many possess expertise in fields that barely existed a generation ago, including digital branding, software development, venture capital, media production, artificial intelligence, and startup culture. At the same time, many continue to maintain a genuine emotional connection to Egypt through family ties and heritage.

Egyptian communities on the American West Coast, particularly in California, also possess significant cultural and creative potential. Egyptians working in film, media, entertainment, advertising, and digital communications bring valuable experience from industries that increasingly shape global influence and public perception. In an age dominated by screens, platforms, and visual storytelling, cultural presence has become closely linked to national influence itself.

The East Coast, particularly New York and the surrounding metropolitan areas, is home to many of the earliest waves of Egyptian immigrants. These communities include small- and medium-sized entrepreneurs, United Nations professionals, banking and financial services personnel, skilled workers, and food industry operators. Their expertise and networks remain underutilised and deserve greater integration into Egypt’s broader engagement strategy with its diaspora.

Likewise, Egyptian communities across the American Midwest, particularly Chicago and Michigan, represent a powerful concentration of scientific expertise, technological innovation, industrial experience, and investment potential. These communities embody precisely the combination of skills and resources that Egypt needs as it continues its economic development journey and seeks to strengthen its competitiveness in a rapidly changing global economy.

At the same time, maintaining strong ties with expatriate communities requires continuous improvement in the services provided to them. Consular services, banking procedures, property transactions, digital government systems, travel coordination, and educational services all shape how expatriates perceive their relationship with state institutions. Communities accustomed to efficient systems abroad naturally expect faster and more responsive services. Addressing these issues is not merely an administrative matter; it is an essential component of maintaining long-term trust between Egypt and millions of Egyptians living overseas.

In recent years, Egyptian officials and diplomats have expanded outreach efforts towards expatriate communities across the US and Canada. Visits to community organisations, universities, churches, mosques, businesses, restaurants, and family gatherings reflect a growing recognition that these communities represent far more than citizens living abroad. They are an integral part of Egypt’s broader human presence in the world.

The success of Egyptians in North America was never built solely on ambition. It was built on education, sacrifice, family discipline, adaptability, and a deep determination to succeed without severing ties to home. Many left Egypt in search of opportunity, but few truly abandoned their connection to it. That relationship has endured across decades and generations. Preserving and strengthening it may prove to be one of Egypt’s most valuable long-term investments in a world increasingly shaped by knowledge, innovation, and global networks.

---

* The writer is a professor of international relations at Geneva School of Diplomacy and senior fellow at Geneva Centre for Security Policy.

* A version of this article appears in print in the 4 June, 2026 edition of Al-Ahram Weekly.

source/content: english.ahram.org.eg/ sameh aboula-enein (headline edited)

_____________

_____________

EGYPT